I had mixed feelings about my findings. I was happy in a 'I have the bestest idea' way when I could not find anyone else with an identical topic, yet I was also disheartened that everyone was so different from where I wanted to go with the information. Ultimately I settled on a site that talks about a single Kofun and a star chart that was found inside of it. I though it made an interesting parallel with grave goods (though I would be tempted to put this ornamentation in that category, but I think others would argue differently). ** SITE **
So here is me playing teacher and giving the site its marks:
I deducted 1 point from referencing because 1) it was not Harvard (not really the writer's fault but it is in my criteria) and 2) there seemed to be little thing off with a couple references (though I could be wrong). The pictures seemed sightly off from the content at times, not enough to take away a full mark, but enough that something needed to be deducted. I had to take away 1 point from text because the writing was geared towards academics and was not accessible to a larger audience. Lastly, I really was not drawn by the plain, white appearance. It seemed to detract from the paper and make it that much harder to read.
Overall the site received 19.5/23. Not a bad mark considering that the site was not made with this rubric in mind. It was a well written essay pasted to a web page for others to see. Nothing else really to it.
hmmm. Definitely makes you think about what makes a good site.

No comments:
Post a Comment